With repeal last year of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell law, many military
people, including senior leaders, assumed that married gay and lesbian
couples had gained not only job security but also equality in
allowances, benefits and access to family support programs. That
assumption is wrong.
Since the law took effect 14 months ago, the Department of Defense
has kept in place policies that bar spouses of same-gender couples from
having military identification cards, shopping on base, living in base
housing or participating in certain family support programs.
Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, says Army Lt. Col. Heather Mack, 39,
"simply just prevented me from losing my job. It didn't do anything
else."
Mack's spouse, Ashley Broadway, also 39, can shop in stores on nearby
Fort Bragg, N.C., only in the status of "caregiver" for their son,
Carson. Lacking a military dependent ID card, Ashley has been challenged
by checkout clerks when her shopping cart includes items such as
deodorant that clearly aren't needed by their two-year old.
If Mack is reassigned, the couple will have to pay Ashley's travel
and transportation costs out of pocket. Mack draws housing allowance at
the higher "with dependents" rate only because of their child. Marriage
alone for same-sex couples, though recognized as legal by 11 states and
the District of Columbia, doesn't qualify a military sponsor for married
allowances or civilian spouses for entry onto bases.
If Mack were killed during her next deployment, Ashley would not
qualify for full "spousal" survivor benefits, even though, by paying
higher premiums, she could be covered as an "insurable interest." And
as a surviving widow, Ashley would not qualify for Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation from the Department of Veterans or be eligible to
receive the folded flag off the coffin in the graveside ceremony, Mack
says, because to the military and the VA, Ashley would not be next of
kin despite spending a career together.
A heterosexual soldier "who meets someone on a Friday night and
Saturday gets married would have full benefits," Mack says. "But you
have partners who have been together 15 years or more and they can't
even go on base and shop…That's a quality of life issue."
Some disparities of treatment for same sex couples won't end unless
Congress repeals the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines
marriage as solely between a man and woman, or unless the U.S. Supreme
Court rules that DOMA is unconstitutional. The high court was expected
to announce soon if it will review and rule on conflicting opinions on
the constitutionality of DOMA by appellate courts in recent years.
The Obama administration views the law unconstitutional and won't
allow Justice Department attorneys to defend it in court. By default,
the government's defense of DOMA is being led by the general counsel for
the Republican-led House of Representatives.
While the law remains in effect, it prohibits extension of many
federal benefits, including military allowances, travel reimbursements
and health coverage to same-sex spouses. But Stephen L. Peters II,
president of the gay and lesbian advocacy group American Military
Partner Association, says the Department of Defense has authority to do
much more than it has to date to support service members and spouses of
same-sex marriages.
It could give gay and lesbian spouses access to base housing,
commissaries and exchanges, base recreation facilities and legal
services. It could direct the services to open more family support
programs to them and to offer relocation and sponsorship at many
overseas duty stations. The services could also extend dual-service
couple programs to same-sex marriages thus ensuring these couples too
get co-located on reassignments.
No DoD official would be interviewed on this issue. The department
instead issue a statement explaining that a work group continues to
conduct "a deliberative and comprehensive review of the possibility of
extending eligibility for benefits, when legally permitted, to same-sex
domestic partners." Benefits are being examined "from a policy, fiscal,
legal and feasibility perspective" and "laws and policies surrounding
benefits are complex and interconnected." The work group, it says, has
been striving "to fully understand the scope and interconnectivity."
Life in service is better for gays and lesbians since repeal of Don't
Ask, Don't Tell. But the department's unresponsiveness to
qualify-of-life concerns raised by same-sex married members for the past
year, unrelated to DOMA, continue to impact not only families but
readiness, Peters argues.
"It's not like the Pentagon doesn't know which benefits it can
extend…These have been repeatedly pointed out," he says. "Not only has
the Pentagon failed to take action but its silence on the issue is
deafening."
Mack, assistant chief of staff for the 1st Theater Sustainment
Command at Bragg, is pregnant and due to deliver their second child in
January. This time Ashley won't have to pose as her sister to be present
at the birth in the post hospital. After maternity leave, Mack expects
to deploy again.
She believes commanders would be pressuring policymakers on
quality-of-life challenges for same-sex couples if they knew more about
them. Mack's own boss was surprised before Mack's promotion in October to
be told the Army treats married lesbians like her as if they aren't
married.
"He said, ‘That's not true. With repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, you
get all the benefits.' I said, ‘No. Any gay or lesbian soldier,
regardless of their marital status, is considered a single soldier.' He
had no clue," Mack says.
As a lieutenant colonel, Mack knows she is better able to afford $500
a month in extra health insurance for Ashley, and to cover her travel
costs when the family is reassigned. Enlisted members can't afford to
handle these disparities, and that's something leaders can't ignore, she
says.
If these spouses could at least be issued ID cards, and gain access
to base amenities, she says, it would go a long way to improving quality
of life.
By Tom Philpott
(Tom Philpott has been breaking news for and about
military people since 1977. After service in the Coast Guard, and 17
years as a reporter and senior editor with Army Times Publishing
Company, Tom launched "Military Update," his syndicated weekly news
column, in 1994. "Military Update" features timely news and analysis on
issues affecting active duty members, reservists, retirees and their
families. Tom also edits a reader reaction column, "Military Forum." The
online "home" for both features is Military.com.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
In 2007, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, answered honestly and affirmatively as to whether he thought homosexuality was immoral and incompatible with military service. Shortly thereafter, George W. Bush’s secretary of defense, Robert Gates, announced that he would recommend that Gen. Pace not be reappointed. Sexual politics trumped honesty.
Post a Comment